CO129-197 - Governor Hennessy - 1882 [1-2] — Page 493

1

}

course would have been to allow the motion to be made

other, if he thought right, the faters, & decline refuse

*

to diveurs lasers not before the Council. W. Johnson you will

see threatens to she the matter fee,

g

ich

be

still further, & it might desciable if he does, to give

-Jafers wichuding Kerbeeley's Dispatch. a. a.d.

The

An Auth

Lord

3/4

Ishould Love thought the motion was propen to be intere in the prafen ; & that the allegen grund

In rejecting it roule, if corect, have formue. The answer

ar

any

date the Sec. of State cannot

an opinions, or

8the motion

hvord

Expressing

Hock

The precedent. May

La Severno

Shiks

incmornènh –

B.24/4

Leraften to any motion that a

her countiey

(5475)

I rent

492

the previous paper

this morning

This does noth

& raisi any new pount of win

Rawt Aph

portante.

Ser 5775

4

Kas